Is your analytics strategy generating value?
Three models for calculating BI value
Three models for calculating BI value
Today’s data driven world demands that people and organizations are conversant in data to drive decisions and create value—but it may seem hard to differentiate between products.
BI platforms are built around providing standardized, operational reporting, with an emphasis on distributing data in a repeatable way. Many modern BI tools still adhere to this model. Visual dashboards improve end-user ability to understand information, and chart-building software reduces the time required for BI consultants to create dashboards - but they fall short of enabling users to adopt analytics as part of their decision-making process.
If you’re looking to create value with your data strategy, you should embrace modern analytics. New revenue streams, cost savings, and efficiencies contribute value to an organization rather than a recurring expenditure. The value for companies who build their culture around insights generated from real, verifiable facts dwarfs the cost savings gained by organizations who deliver report and dashboard-based solutions.
Understanding the value of business intelligence needs to be assessed not just in terms of the cost and functional benefits of the software, but also in terms of the business benefits that are enabled by data-driven decision-making.
Matt AslettResearch Director with responsibility for the Data, AI & Analytics Channel, 451 Research
Depending on where your organization is on its journey to becoming data-driven, you might choose to focus on cost optimization, efficiency, or effectiveness.
Calculate the total cost of owning a BI solution and choose the lowest-cost option.
Compare gains in worker productivity achieved with different solutions, and use the cost of labor to compute a return on your investment.
Quantify the value gained from improved decision-making across your organization, as produced by a more informed workforce.
Often customers evaluate license costs, but do not consider support, training and add-on technologies that add to their total cost. This model assumes that the gross value you’ll receive from the many BI technologies available to you will be about the same, meaning that the most important thing is to choose the option that will cost you the least amount of money. This isn’t always true, but it works in some situations.
There are several factors that should be included in Total Cost of Ownership, not just license cost. These include platform and labor costs:
PLATFORM COSTS
LABOR COSTS
How to Choose the Right Modern BI & Analytics Platform - a guide to help you define the supporting requirements for a modern analytics workflow.
Example
Data analysis technology helps workers understand information more quickly. The Worker Productivity Model calculates the benefit to your workforce by computing the total amount of time you will save versus other technologies.
This model assumes that if your employees spend less time doing analysis, they can either have bandwidth to do more analysis, or can do other tasks that add value to your business.
Creation Differential: The difference in effort to create analytical output in different platforms relative to the current approach.
Consumption Differential: The difference in end-user experience to get information from different platforms relative to the current approach.
Value Factor: Average expectation of the value added by a knowledge worker in your organization. This optional approach provides a shorthand way to reflect an effectiveness component into the Efficiency Model.
Example (The intent of this model is to maximize value; therefore, higher numbers are better)
*These are the three inputs / levers that will affect the results from this model. Consider the true users of your BI system (rather than having IT buyers perform the entire evaluation). Including those who will perform these tasks will give you a sense of the associated costs and how each action will scale in addition to resulting in more precise estimates.
The Expected Impact Model asks, “If a worker is X% more likely to make a good decision with this technology, what is the value of that?” This model is the hardest to quantify because it requires aligning the technology you are evaluating to real business outcomes. However, it is the truest to real-life. It can also show increased creation and consumption of business intelligence not reflected in the previous sections. The efficiency of freed labor can be applied to generating additional and impactful business insights through analytics.
Scenario: The business benefit recognized by becoming more informed is defined by the outcomes you are trying to achieve. This includes an estimated value of a good outcome.
Scope of Decision: What decisions influence your defined outcomes? Lines of business understand which decisions impact the outcomes they are trying to achieve.
Improvement: How much will access to data help knowledge workers make better decisions, and how do you compare the extent to which different technologies will impact decision-making? This value can be quantified in an improvement rate that shows how much more value improved decisions will add to your scenario.
Example
*Can’t see all data points in a single view with BI Vendor, so no improved accuracy.
**BI Dashboards improved decision-making speed, but not as much as visual analytics process.
Learn how one of the largest health care complexes in the world saved 5,000 analyst hours and automated 85-92% of their reconciliation process with Tableau.
See how Nationwide leverages Tableau to improve IT efficiency with visual analytics and save 800 hours each year.
Find out how global aviation group Lufthansa increased efficiency by 30% and reduced business reliance on IT with Tableau.