Highlight Tables and Heatmaps

Understanding and using Highlight Tables and Heatmaps

Poor Example

This highlight table looks at sales, profits and orders per month and year. However, this table is poorly designed and can leave the reader confused.

  • One table uses a similar color to the table that looks at the number of orders. It is impossible to tell the difference between the low profit color and the number of ordered colors. Profit and sales also use similar colors that bleed into each other.
  • Orders, profits, and sales blend in with each other.

Better Alternative

A better alternative for this would be a bar chart that looks at all the sales, profits, and orders per month and year. The numbers are more evident in the bar chart than they were in the highlight table.

Furthermore, the categories don’t bleed into each other. Highlight tables shouldn’t be used to measure more than one category.

Poor Example

This heatmap splits those four regions used previously into four years per region, making it difficult to compare the same Sub-Category across Regions for the same year. The heatmap also relies on legends to decipher what mark color and size means which can make it difficult to understand.

Better Alternative

Because a heatmap is still the best solution for this much information, we will keep the chart type but will reorganize fields to make it easy to compare subcategories for each Year/Region combination. We’ll also change the shape to one that is easier for our eyes to compare across space (square). Last, we will put descriptors in the title making it easier to identify what the encoding of size and color mean in the view. Here is the proposed alternative: